Ford and Taylorism Theory Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Ford Motor and Taylorism Theory. Answer: Introduction The Ford Motor Company was founded by Henry Ford and he adapted the theory of Taylorism created by Frederick Winslow Taylor to measure the workflow of his labor in order to increase his profit and give out more salary to the efficient workmen (Urick, Adams and Smith 2017). Thomas Friedman states the three era of globalization where it reveals that the world is flat in the sense the individuals are collaborating and competing with other individual on a global basis (Ghemawat 2017). The discussion below in the report will discuss the activity of week 1 and week 2 in brief and throwing light on the concepts of the Ford and Taylorism theory and Thomas Friedman on globalization and the three different era of the global world along with the iron rule that states that the world is flat. Discussion Week 1 Scientific management theory was framed by Frederick Winslow Taylor. The theory is sometimes also known as Taylorism. This theory analyses workflows of the labors productivity in order to improve efficiency of productivity. The theory founded that individual workers are more productive if the assigned task to them were according to their capabilities and strengths which will increase productivity. Henry Ford with his visionary ideas formed a company which manufactured cars incorporated in the year 1903 (Ford Corporate, 2018). The company was named as the Ford Motor Company. Henry Ford was the first to use the theory in his manufacturing company (Uddin and Hossain 2015). Therefore, Ford and Taylorism initiated the idea of massive production. In short, the theory focuses on both higher wages for the workmen and higher productivity leading higher profits for the company. The American and Australian or European employees would not accept the Taylorism theory in their workplace because these countries are more towards the individualism in nature resulting to the want of freedom and empowerment (Hoover and Nash 2016). In addition, with change in time, technology and automation has changed which in turn creates less chances of applying the theory. The call centers aim to make the maximum calls or increase the sales which are somewhat similar for each of its employees. The theory Ford and Taylorism can be used in this type organization to measure the productivity and performance of each of the employees working (Waring 2016). Similarly, this theory can be used in any organization where the need to analyze the performance of the employees according to their assigned job is required. However, the theory used long years back but if applied in present business world, there are chances of higher productivity or in some cases dissatisfaction among the employees resulting into low production. In the present time, the employees are more inspire with a challenging environment with raised salaries in their workplace which enhance to increase in quantitative productivity. On the other hand, team work efforts are more emerging as an important trend in global business environment. Hence, some of the aspects of the theory can be implemented in the global business operations. Week 2 Thomas Friedman analyzes three main eras of globalization as, era 1 from 1492-1800 which states that when the world was run by states and looked upon the conditions which their country can offer; era 2 from 1800-2000 reveals that the countries in this globalization offered and looked upon to compete in the global level with their companies and the final third era as from 2000 to present time and foresees the future as well where each individual competes for his or her benefit with other individual (Huang 2015). The flat world is a risk to the living in the present time considering the third era where the individual are busy competing with each other. According to Thomas Friedman whatever is about to be done it is done at any cost. In simple words, the idea to innovate will be accomplished by any of the individual from whole world. Therefore the competitive advantage has to be earned by each of the people with their own effort (Books 2017). The iron rule of Thomas Friedman of the world being flat in the third era of globalization where it is found to be uniform across the world but creates obstacle in the path of execution of any idea as each individual think of their own benefit. In spite of standing individual and competing still each individual works in a group to achieve the target but contribute the best among all. However, the flat world makes it clear that the individual has to compete with each other on the basis of their own idea and effort in order to collaborate and represent and implement his or her idea successfully. Execution of idea will have risk while implementing it but some people who overcome can innovate and implement it appropriately. Each individual has their own capability to integrate and dynamically bring change and impact on the whole world. There is a global competition where each one has to be a part of the possibility. Conclusion From the above discourse, based on the Ford and Taylorism theory it can be concluded that it analyses the labors productivity to improve efficiency. The organization in the present world can use some aspects of the theory which focuses on to gain high salary for the workmens work contribution and for the companys profit. From the Friedmans world is flat approach it is concluded that the present century is the 3.0 era from among the three eras of globalization. There are many risk associated with it. In this era if an individual does not analyze and progress with his or her own idea then someone else will take the idea and will earn the benefit References Books, W., 2017.Summary and Analysis of The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century: Based on the Book by Thomas L. Friedman. Open Road Media. Ford Corporate. (2018).Ford Motor Company Timeline. [online] Available at: https://corporate.ford.com/history.html [Accessed 13 Feb. 2018]. Ghemawat, P., 2017. 11 Why managers still need to take account of comparative advantage.Cloth for Wine?, p.87. Hoover, H. and Nash, G., 2016.American individualism. Hoover Press. Huang, G., 2015. Global visions and East/West intercultural communications: From Whitman to Kipling to Friedman.Comunicacin y Sociedad, (24), pp.161-186. Uddin, N. and Hossain, F., 2015. Evolution of modern management through Taylorism: An adjustment of scientific management comprising behavioral science.Procedia Computer Science,62, pp.578-584. Urick, M.J., Adams, D.E. and Smith, T., 2017. Taylorism and Operational Excellence Improving on the One Best Way.Journal of Leadership and Management,1(9-10). Waring, S.P., 2016.Taylorism transformed: Scientific management theory since 1945. UNC Press Books